基于主成分分析的10个葡萄品种果实营养元素比较

doi:10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.04.003

Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 13-16.doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.04.003

• Researches and Scientific Notes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of nutrient elements in 10 different varieties of grape fruits based on principal component analysis

Ren Xiaoqin¹, Wen Hao¹, Xue Xiaoqi¹, Wang Zhixue^{2,Corresponding Author}, Yang Jinghui¹, Liu Yanjun¹

1. College of Horticulture and Landscape, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300392, China;
2. Fruit Research Institute, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300384, China

Received:2021-06-28 Online:2022-12-30 Published:2023-01-03

Abstract

Abstract: Ten grape varieties were as the test materials. The six nutritional elements of boron, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc in fruits were measured. The differences of nutritional elements in different varieties were studied in order to provide theoretical basis for grape nutritional diagnosis The results showed that there were significant differences in nutrient elements among 10 different grape varieties; Correlation analysis showed that boron was positively correlated with iron, magnesium and zinc; There was a significant positive correlation between calcium and zinc; There was a significant positive correlation between iron and zinc; There was no significant difference among other nutrients; The main ingredients results comprehensive ranking is：‘Manicure Finger’>‘Red Globe’>‘Kyoho’>‘Sunshine Rose’>‘Gold Finger’>‘Portugal's Dream’> ‘Jade Seedless’>‘Summer Black’>‘Apis florea’>‘Purple sweet Seedless’. This study lays a theoretical foundation for the practical production of grape.

Key words: grape, variety, nutrient element, principal component analysis

CLC Number:

S663.1

Ren Xiaoqin, Wen Hao, Xue Xiaoqi, Wang Zhixue, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun. Comparison of nutrient elements in 10 different varieties of grape fruits based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(4): 13-16.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.04.003

http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V29/I4/13

References

[1] 程大伟,何莎莎,李明,等. 不同葡萄品种果实营养品质差异及综合评价[J]. 江西农业学报,2020,32(10):72-76.
[2] 卢小草,邱志鹏,李敏,等. 葡萄果皮花青素提取工艺优化研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2019,35(8):114-121.
[3] 吴茂东. 施氮时期对‘黑比诺’葡萄矿质元素含量及果实品质的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020.
[4] 杨喆. 天津地区玫瑰香葡萄功能成分解析研究[D]. 天津:天津农学院,2019.
[5] 王馨雨,王蓉蓉,王婷,等. 不同品种百合内外鳞片游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(12):211-220.
[6] MILOŠEVIÓ T,MILOŠEVIÓ N. Phenotypic diversity of autochthonous European and Damson plum accessions based on multivariate analysis[J]. Horticultural Science,2012,39:8-20.
[7] 李伟,郜海燕,陈杭君,等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(6):161-171.
[8] 董琼,李世民,高尚杰,等. 不同种源树番茄果实品质比较及综合分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2002,48(4):266-273.
[9] 孙艳,韩斌,袁军伟,等. 不同抗寒性葡萄品种根系形态结构及生理性状差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2021,23(4):47-57.
[10] 朱帅蒙. 不同葡萄品种果实品质对外源硒肥的响应[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2018.
[11] 程大伟,何莎莎,李明,等. 不同葡萄品种果实营养品质差异及综合评价[J]. 江西农业学报,2020,32(10):76-80.
[12] 白永超,卫旭芳,陈露,等. 笃斯越橘果实、叶片矿质元素和土壤肥力因子与果实品质的多元分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(1):170-181.
[13] 雷靖. 不同钙镁配比对柚果实产量、品质及钙镁吸收的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2019.
[14] 杨莉,张涓涓,刘德春,等. 马家柚及变异品系果实发育期间矿质营养变化及与果实内含物的相关性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2018,40(3):479-486.
[15] PARTELLI F L,OLIVEIRA M G,COVRE A M,et al,Nutritional standards and nutritional diagnosis of the conilon coffee plants in phenological growth stage[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition,2018,41(19):2536-2546.
[16] 高春丽,马振朝,王志慧,等. 河北省红地球葡萄土壤与叶片营养诊断分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2021,49(6):114-119.

Comparison of nutrient elements in 10 different varieties of grape fruits based on principal component analysis

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Wen Hao, Ren Xiaoqin, Yang Jinghui, Li Bing, Zhang Chao, Wang Xing. Annual dynamic changes of leaf nutrient elements in high and low yield Dongzao orchards [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(4): 12-16.
[2]	Ding Yongxin, Wang Shiyi, Zhang Yue, Liu Yihan, Guo Xiaoou. Quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of different melon varieties in Xiqing District of Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(3): 7-11.
[3]	Ren Xiaoqin, Wen Hao, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun, Li Bing, Liang Fahui. Principal component analysis of fruit quality of 8 grape varieties [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(2): 7-10.
[4]	Yan Yusi, Lu Jun, Song Ke, Li Bing, Yang Jinghui, Zhang Chao. Effects of potassium fertilization on the quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grapes [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(3): 14-18.
[5]	Zhang Weilong, Song Ke, Yang Jinghui, Wang Zhixue, Zhang Chao, Li Bing. Effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 32-36.
[6]	Wen Hao, Yang Jinghui, Li Tianjie, Liu Yanjun, Zhang Chao, Wang Zhixue. Fruit quality analysis of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 37-40.
[7]	Zhang Jianting, Gao Zhonghao, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun, Wang Zhixue, Zhang Chao. Comparison of fruit quality of Dongzao jujube from different variety [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(4): 11-15.
[8]	Song Ke, Yang Jinghui, Xia Kaili, Wu Chunxia, Liang Fahui, Wang Haixia. Quality difference analysis of 5 pear varieties on mild saline and alkaline land [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(3): 12-17.
[9]	Zhang Weilong, Yang Jinghui, Song Ke, Jiang Xin, Gao Wei, Zhang Chao, Feng Guohua. Evaluation and selection of main characters of oil peony ‘Feng Dan' based on principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(2): 12-17.
[10]	Dong Yuanyuan, Chai Cijiang, Xia Rui, Huang Jieping, Cen Fen. Effects of environment, stem section state and sugar-free medium on rooting of grape plantlet in vitro cultured in soil supporting medium [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(1): 17-20.
[11]	HUANG Yan, GAO Zhong-hao, YANG Jing-hui, QIAO Bo-chao, LIU Yan-jun, WANG Xing. Comparison of fruit quality of three new grape varieties in saline-alkali land [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(3): 18-21.
[12]	ZHANG Wei-long, YANG Jing-hui, LIANG Fa-hui, LÜ Chen-fei, FENG Guo-hua, LIU Yan-jun. Effect of different immersion time on grape cracking [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 10-14.
[13]	LÜ Chen-fei^1a, YANG Jing-hui^1a, LIU Yan-jun^1a, YANG Ren-jie^1b, ZHANG Chao², WU Nan^1b. Identification of red grape origin based on NIRS and PLS-DA [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 21-23.
[14]	REN Xiao-qin, YANG Jing-hui, LIU Zheng, LIU Hong-ling, SONG Ke. Comparison of cold tolerance physiological characteristics of different jujube varieties in Dagang, Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 28-31.
[15]	JIANG Xin, HUANG Han-da, YANG Jing-hui, FENG Guo-hua, WANG Xing, HU Zhong-hui. Comparative study on quality changes of different varieties of blueberry promoted by cultivation [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2019, 26(4): 9-15.