8个葡萄品种果实品质的主成分分析

doi:10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2023.02.002

Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 7-10.doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2023.02.002

• Researches and Scientific Notes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Principal component analysis of fruit quality of 8 grape varieties

Ren Xiaoqin¹, Wen Hao¹, Yang Jinghui^{1,Corresponding Author}, Liu Yanjun¹, Li Bing², Liang Fahui¹

1. College of Horticulture and Landscape, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300392, China;
2. Institute of Agriculture Resources and Environment, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences ,Tianjin 300384, China

Received:2021-06-30 Online:2023-04-30 Published:2023-06-28

Abstract

Abstract: The external quality（single fruit weight, transverse diameter, longitudinal diameter, fruit shape index）and internal quality（soluble sugar, soluble solid, water content, titratable acid, VC, ratio of sugar to acid）were measured with eight varieties of grapes, respectively. By comparing the differences of fruit quality in eight different varieties, this study screens high quality grapes and provides theoretical basis for grape nutrition diagnosis. The result showed that the fruit quality of 8 grape varieties showed significant difference; correlation analysis showed that the correlation between single fruit weight and transverse diameter was significantly positive;there was a significant negative correlation between transverse diameter and fruit shape index;the longitudinal diameter was positively correlated with the content of VC, negatively correlated with the soluble solids, and positively correlated with the fruit shape index;fruit shape index was negatively correlated with VC;there was a significant positive correlation between soluble sugar and soluble solids;the comprehensive ranking after principal component analysis：‘Portugal's Dream’>‘Purple Sweet Seedless’>‘Summer Black’>‘Muscat Hamburg’>‘Manicure Finger’>‘Sunshine Rose’> ‘Sapphir’>‘Xinjiang Seedless Dew’. The best comprehensive quality is the fruit of ‘Portugal's Dream’ and the worst is ‘Xinjiang Seedless Dew’ .

Key words: grape, variety, correlation analysis, principal component analysis

CLC Number:

S663.1

Ren Xiaoqin, Wen Hao, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun, Li Bing, Liang Fahui. Principal component analysis of fruit quality of 8 grape varieties[J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(2): 7-10.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2023.02.002

http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V30/I2/7

References

[1] 吴钰滢. 葡萄富硒特性及形态分析[D]. 沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2019.
[2] 吴茂东. 施氮时期对‘黑比诺’葡萄矿质元素含量及果实品质的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020.
[3] 宋科. 配方施肥对玫瑰香葡萄生长和果实品质及土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 天津:天津农学院,2020.
[4] CHANG X,TIAN M,ZHANG Q,et al.Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract ameliorates cisplatin-induced testicular apoptosis via PI3K/Akt/mTOR and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways in rats[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry,2021,45(8):e13825.
[5] 孙艳,韩斌,袁军伟,等. 不同抗寒性葡萄品种根系形态结构及生理性状差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2021,23(4):47-57.
[6] 吴远峰,晁冲,王海丽,等. 阳光玫瑰葡萄性状表现及优质高效栽培技术[J]. 河北果树,2020(4):41-42,44.
[7] 杨静,赵子丹,牛艳,等. HPLC技术对贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄中酚酸类物质的检测方法研究[J]. 浙江农业科学,2021,62(4):777-783.
[8] 江雨,孟江飞,刘崇怀,等. 中国野生葡萄果实基本品质、酚类物质含量及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(7):142-148.
[9] 程大伟,何莎莎,李明,等. 不同葡萄品种果实营养品质差异及综合评价[J]. 江西农业学报,2020,32(10):72-76.
[10] 任晓琴,孟洁,陈渊舜,等. 不同灌水量对静海冬枣果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2021(9):32-38.
[11] 袁启凤,陈楠,严佳文,等. 基于果实品质主成分分析的‘黄金百香果’栽培架式评价[J]. 中国果树,2021(1):22-27.
[12] 武琳霞,李玲,张国光,等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的不同产地冬枣品质特性分析[J]. 食品科学,2022,43(8):334-338.
[13] 张欢,慕新浩,李珂,等. 不同石榴品种果实品质的主成分分析[J]. 南阳师范学院学报,2020,19(6):33-39.
[14] 李跃红,冉茂乾,徐孟怀,等. 不同品种猕猴桃果实品质比较与综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020,46(23):162-168.
[15] 李林林,黄敏升,崔国贤,等. 苎麻种质资源农艺性状主成分及聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2019,21(3):34-41.
[16] 杨磊,靳娟,樊丁宇,等. 新疆石榴果实品质主成分分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2018,55(2):262-268.

Principal component analysis of fruit quality of 8 grape varieties

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Dai Xuebin, TianXiuping, Zhao Qiu, Dong Jiaxi. Effects of long-term winter green manure on soil organic nitrogen components [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(5): 11-15.
[2]	Ding Yongxin, Wang Shiyi, Zhang Yue, Liu Yihan, Guo Xiaoou. Quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of different melon varieties in Xiqing District of Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(3): 7-11.
[3]	Ren Xiaoqin, Wen Hao, Xue Xiaoqi, Wang Zhixue, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun. Comparison of nutrient elements in 10 different varieties of grape fruits based on principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(4): 13-16.
[4]	Yan Yusi, Lu Jun, Song Ke, Li Bing, Yang Jinghui, Zhang Chao. Effects of potassium fertilization on the quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grapes [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(3): 14-18.
[5]	Zhang Weilong, Song Ke, Yang Jinghui, Wang Zhixue, Zhang Chao, Li Bing. Effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 32-36.
[6]	Wen Hao, Yang Jinghui, Li Tianjie, Liu Yanjun, Zhang Chao, Wang Zhixue. Fruit quality analysis of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 37-40.
[7]	Zhang Jianting, Gao Zhonghao, Yang Jinghui, Liu Yanjun, Wang Zhixue, Zhang Chao. Comparison of fruit quality of Dongzao jujube from different variety [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(4): 11-15.
[8]	Song Ke, Yang Jinghui, Xia Kaili, Wu Chunxia, Liang Fahui, Wang Haixia. Quality difference analysis of 5 pear varieties on mild saline and alkaline land [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(3): 12-17.
[9]	Zhang Weilong, Yang Jinghui, Song Ke, Jiang Xin, Gao Wei, Zhang Chao, Feng Guohua. Evaluation and selection of main characters of oil peony ‘Feng Dan' based on principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(2): 12-17.
[10]	Wu Tong, Guo Huiyun, Zheng Yiteng, Ma Chuang, Ji Kai, Gao Heyi. Study on biomass accumulation dynamics of stump sprouting of Quercus variabilis and its influence factors [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(1): 6-11.
[11]	Dong Yuanyuan, Chai Cijiang, Xia Rui, Huang Jieping, Cen Fen. Effects of environment, stem section state and sugar-free medium on rooting of grape plantlet in vitro cultured in soil supporting medium [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(1): 17-20.
[12]	HUANG Yan, GAO Zhong-hao, YANG Jing-hui, QIAO Bo-chao, LIU Yan-jun, WANG Xing. Comparison of fruit quality of three new grape varieties in saline-alkali land [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(3): 18-21.
[13]	ZHANG Wei-long, YANG Jing-hui, LIANG Fa-hui, LÜ Chen-fei, FENG Guo-hua, LIU Yan-jun. Effect of different immersion time on grape cracking [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 10-14.
[14]	LÜ Chen-fei^1a, YANG Jing-hui^1a, LIU Yan-jun^1a, YANG Ren-jie^1b, ZHANG Chao², WU Nan^1b. Identification of red grape origin based on NIRS and PLS-DA [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 21-23.
[15]	REN Xiao-qin, YANG Jing-hui, LIU Zheng, LIU Hong-ling, SONG Ke. Comparison of cold tolerance physiological characteristics of different jujube varieties in Dagang, Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(1): 28-31.