不同浓度Fe、Ca、Zn肥配比对‘玫瑰香’葡萄产量及果实品质的影响

doi:10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.02.007

Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 32-36.doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.02.007

• Researches and Scientific Notes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape

Zhang Weilong¹, Song Ke¹, Yang Jinghui^{1,Corresponding Author}, Wang Zhixue², Zhang Chao³, Li Bing⁴

1. College of Horticulture and Landscape, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300392, China;
2. Tianjin Forestry Fruit Tree Research Institute, Tianjin 300384, China;
3. Tianjin Shuofang Green Technology Development Limited Company, Tianjin 300384, China;
4. Tianjin Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Science, Tianjin 300384, China

Received:2020-10-07 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-05

Abstract

Abstract: In order to study the effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca, and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape, treatment 1（leaves sprayed with 0.1% Fe, Ca, Zn）, treatment 2（leaves sprayed with 0.2% Fe, 0.4 % Ca, 0.3% Zn）and treatment 3（leaves sprayed with 0.3% Fe, 0.8% Ca, 0.5% Zn）were used to determine the yield and fruit quality, etc. 11 indicators, with spraying the same amount of water as CK. The results showed that all treatments could increase yield, and treatment 2 had the highest increase rate, which was 62.48%. Treatment 1 had the largest increase rate of single ear weight, single fruit weight, and soluble protein, which were 39.31%, 29.36%, and 88.00%, respectively. Treatment 2 has the largest increased soluble solids, titratable acid, and soluble sugar, which are 9.03%, 15.15%, and 23.36% respectively. Treatment 3 increased the rate of spike shape, fruit shape index, Vc, and fruit hardness the most, which were 43.84%, 6.25%, 131.42% and 57.36%, respectively. The membership function of comprehensive yield and fruit quality showed that treatment 2 was the best, treatment 1 was the better, and then treatment 3 and CK were followed.

Key words: concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn, ‘Muscat Hamburg' grape, yield, fruit quality

CLC Number:

S663.1

Zhang Weilong, Song Ke, Yang Jinghui, Wang Zhixue, Zhang Chao, Li Bing. Effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape[J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 32-36.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2022.02.007

http://xuebao.tjau.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V29/I2/32

References

[1] 唐晓东. 四倍体‘玫瑰香’葡萄抗早衰的栽培生理防控技术[D]. 保定:河北农业大学,2009.
[2] 商佳胤,田淑芬,朱志强,等. 采收时间对‘玫瑰香’葡萄果实品质及芳香化合物组分的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2013,28(1):155-162.
[3] 谢玉明,易干军,张秋明. 钙在果树生理代谢中的作用[J]. 果树学报,2003,20(5):369-373.
[4] 李娟,陈杰忠,黄永敬,等. Zn营养在果树生理代谢中的作用研究进展[J]. 果树学报,2011,28(4):668-673.
[5] 沙守峰,李俊才,王家珍,等. 叶面喷施钙肥和锌肥对‘早金酥’梨果实糖酸含量的影响[J]. 果树学报,2018,35(1):109-113.
[6] 侯广欣. 深冬设施环境及钾、锌营养对番茄品质、产量影响[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学,2018.
[7] 李秋煜,丁欣欣,贾莉芳,等. 硒与锌铁配施对不同核桃品种果实品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2020,48(6):896-900,905.
[8] 孙良忠,于丽娜,赵红梅,等. 小麦节水条件下氮磷用量对产量的影响试验研究[J]. 中国农业信息,2016,(2):66-67,69.
[9] 高海生,贾艳茹,魏建梅,等. 用物性分析仪检测鸭梨和京白梨果实采后质地的变化[J]. 园艺学报,2012,39(7):1359-1364.
[10] 韩真,李秀杰,翟衡,等. 生长调节剂对夏黑葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报,2014,26(11):40-42.
[11] 曹建康. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007.
[12] 阿衣古力·阿不都瓦依提,阿布来克·尼牙孜,阿布都热合曼·吾买尔,等. 新疆产5个梨品种果实品质比较[J]. 新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(6):509-512.
[13] 夏凯丽,刘婷,杨静慧,等. 黑莓体细胞胚诱导中的细胞生理特性[J]. 中国南方果树,2018,47(1):114-118.
[14] 车玉红,李丙智,王应刚,等. 钙肥对富士苹果品质及Ca²+-ATPase活性影响的研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2005,25(4):803-805.
[15] 张富民,赖呈纯,潘红,等. 葡萄钙素营养需求与施用措施[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2018(5):53-56.
[16] 张瑞娥. 常见植物营养素在葡萄上的应用[J]. 内蒙古农业科技,2014(3):63-65.
[17] 郑秋玲,谭伟,马宁,等. 钙对高温下巨峰葡萄叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(9):1963-1968.
[18] 刘忠强,李新中. 果树缺铁性黄叶的发生与防治[J]. 科学种养,2018(3):34-35.
[19] 杨艳,付文进,范宏迪,等. 施用铁肥对红地球葡萄成熟的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技,2006(1):46-47.
[20] 罗来辉. 施锌对沙田柚果实品质的影响[J]. 嘉应学院学报(自然科学版),2010,28(5):71-74.
[21] 于涛,徐德坤,刘宝传,等. 2种钙肥对葡萄产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国园艺文摘,2016,32(5):34,135.
[22] 王红,张峰,申长卫,等. 不同喷钙措施对‘库尔勒香梨’顶腐病发生的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2013,36(6):25-29.
[23] 冯作永,陵军成. 土壤施钙对设施红地球葡萄果实钙含量及品质的影响[J]. 青海农林科技,2015(1):4-7.
[24] STEFANIE,PESCHEL,MORITZ,et al. Characterization of microcracks in the cuticle of developing sweet cherry fruit[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2005,130(4):487-495.

Effects of different concentrations of Fe, Ca and Zn fertilizers on the yield and fruit quality of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Jiang Huidong, Li Yongjie, Tang Yunlong, Wang Xiaobo, Xu Xiaoyan. Effects of biogas slurry application on rice growth and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2024, 31(1): 6-11.
[2]	Song Jiaxin, Shi Wenxin, Liu Shihui, Wang Mengyi. Effects of microbial fertilizer on eggplant growth and development and soil environment [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(5): 16-22.
[3]	Du Jin, Liu Jian, Zhao Fei, Duan Yueyang, Yang Jilin, Yang Yong. Comparison of rice yield, quality and economic benefits under different planting modes [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(4): 17-20.
[4]	Wen Hao, Sun Yi, Ren Xiaoqin, Yang Jinghui, Zhang Qi. Analysis on fruit quality differences of different apple varieties cultivated in open field in Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(3): 21-25.
[5]	Hua Renrui, Sun Shihai, Zhang Weihua, Liu Yuling, Yin Chaoqun, Zhang Meng. Effects of nitrogen concentration on yield and nitrate content of Chinese chive in soilless culture [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(2): 18-22.
[6]	Kang Chen, Tan Yan, Luo Feng, Sun Shoujun. Effect of planting density on agronomic characters, biological yield and quality of forage sorghum [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(1): 22-26.
[7]	Ren Xiaoqin, Wang Wei, Yang Jinghui, Wen Hao, Shi Yanyu, Liu Yanjun. Effect of girdling on ‘Dongzao’ fruit quality [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2023, 30(1): 32-35.
[8]	Zhao Bo, Tong Xiaopeng, Wu Wenwen, Zhang Nan, Wang Weixian, Pei Zhongyou. Study on correlation between juice yield and vein color of sweet sorghum [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 7-12.
[9]	Wen Hao, Yang Jinghui, Li Tianjie, Liu Yanjun, Zhang Chao, Wang Zhixue. Fruit quality analysis of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(2): 37-40.
[10]	Li Xiawen, Lu Shuchang. Effects of regulator application combined with water-saving irrigation on yield, quality and nutrient absorption of dry direct seeding rice [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(1): 8-14.
[11]	Tan Yan, Lu Huayu, Kang Chen, Sun Shoujun, Luo Feng. Genetic analysis of yield traits in the hybrid progeny of Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2021, 28(2): 6-11.
[12]	Xin Wei, Nie Jiangli, Yang Nan, Pei Yi. Amino acid composition and content analysis of fruits of 3 black currant varieties introduced in Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(4): 21-26.
[13]	ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Lie, CUI Ru-qing, LIU Qi, DU Jin, CAO Gao-yi, TIAN Xiu-ping. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and forage quality of silage maize [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(3): 1-6.
[14]	HUANG Yan, GAO Zhong-hao, YANG Jing-hui, QIAO Bo-chao, LIU Yan-jun, WANG Xing. Comparison of fruit quality of three new grape varieties in saline-alkali land [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(3): 18-21.
[15]	MENG Jie, HUANG Han-da, YANG Jing-hui, LIU Yan-jun, LIANG Fa-hui, ZHANG Chao. Quality differences and changes of fruit stored in room temperature between different blueberry varieties [J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020, 27(2): 11-17.