天津农学院学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 9-15.doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2018.03.002

• 研究与简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻米品质的相关性分析

王志玺1,5, 吕文俊1,5, 崔晶1,5, 黄亮1, 张欣1,5, 楠谷彰人2,5, 松江勇次3,5, 崔中秋4,5,通信作者   

  1. 1. 天津农学院 农学与资源环境学院,天津 300384;
    2. 香川大学,日本 香川 761-0795;
    3. 九州大学 大学院农学研究院,日本 福冈 812-8581;
    4. 天津市农业科学院,天津 300384;
    5. 天津市食味水稻国际联合研究中心,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-14 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2019-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 崔中秋(1986-),男,助理研究员,博士,主要从事水稻食味品质育种。E-mail:15822958203@163.com。
  • 作者简介:王志玺(1992-),男,硕士在读,研究方向为水稻品质(食味)改良研究。E-mail:wangzhixi19920904@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“七大农作物育种”重点专项(2017YFD0100505); 天津市科技计划项目(ITTRRS2018013)

Correlation analysis of rice quality

WANG Zhi-xi1,5, LÜ Wen-jun1,5, CUI Jing1,5, HUANG Liang1, ZHANG Xin1,5, Akihito Kusutani2,5, Yuji Matsue3,5, CUI Zhong-qiu4,5,Corresponding Author   

  1. 1. College of Agronomy and Resource Environment, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China;
    2. Kagawa University, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan;
    3. Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan;
    4. Tianjin Rice Research Institute, Tianjin 300384, China;
    5. Tianjin International Joint Research and Development Center on Palatability and Quality of Rice, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2018-05-14 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2019-11-12

摘要: 为深入研究稻米品质食味特性,本研究系统地探讨了影响品质食味的因素与综合评价值之间的相关性,以期为加速推进优质食味水稻品种(系)的选育提供相应的理论依据和技术参考。试验采用8个水稻品种(系)进行了稻米理化特性的测定,分析了糙米的外观品质、精米的蛋白质含有率、直链淀粉含有率、米饭的物化特性、稻米淀粉的糊化特性等指标。结果表明:综合评价值与糙米的外观品质、精米的蛋白质含有率、直链淀粉含有率、米饭的物化特性、稻米淀粉的糊化特性等存在不同程度的相关性,但这些理化指标与综合评价值之间相关性并不显著(P>0.05)。表明稻米的各理化指标并不能准确地反映最终的食味品质。

关键词: 水稻, 加工品质, 外观品质, 营养品质, 食味(蒸煮)品质, 贮藏品质

Abstract: In order to further study rice quality to accelerate the breeding of quality and eating rice varieties(or lines)and provide the corresponding theoretical basis and technical reference, this study systematically probed into the correlation between the factors influencing the quality of rice and the synthetic evaluation value of rice. This test proposed 8 rice varieties(or lines)to determine the physical and chemical properties of rice, at the same time analyzed the appearance quality of brown rice, white rice protein containing rate, amylose content, and rice starch gelatinization characteristics index. The results show that there are different degrees of correlation between the comprehensive evaluation value and appearance quality of brown rice, white rice protein containing rate, amylose content, rice starch gelatinization characteristics, but the correlation between the physical and chemical index and the comprehensive evaluation value is not significant (P>0.05).The above results indicate that the various physicochemical indexes of rice can not accurately reflect the final taste quality.

Key words: rice, processing quality, appearance quality, nutritional quality, palatability(cooking)quality, storage quality

中图分类号: