Abstract: The scientific evaluation of ideological and political education integrated into curriculum instruction has emerged as a critical challenge in the reform of blended teaching. Addressing the “online-offline-practice-reflection” continuum characteristic of blended learning, this study develops a systematic and quantifiable evaluation framework informed by Outcome-Based Education（OBE）principles and operationalized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process（AHP）. The framework comprises 4 first-level and 11 second-level indicators. An empirical investigation involving 620 students enrolled in the Mathematical Modeling Methods and Applications course at Tianjin Agricultural University reveals an average comprehensive achievement score of 74.8 for students' ideological and political literacy. The analysis identifies two critical deficiencies: the absence of value-oriented guidance in online learning environments and the lack of structured opportunities for students to engage in value conflict resolution. In response, targeted improvement strategies are proposed. The findings demonstrate that the evaluation system exhibits robust scientific validity and practical applicability, effectively establishing a closed-loop mechanism of “evaluation-analysis-improvement”. This study offers a replicable framework for the quantitative assessment and continuous enhancement of ideological and political education within blended teaching contexts.

Key words: outcome-based education（OBE）, analytic hierarchy process（AHP）, blended teaching, evaluation system for ideological and political education, Mathematical Modeling Methods and Applications