天津农学院学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 78-82.doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2020.04.015

• 经济管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

宅基地“三权分置”的实践难题及破解路径

李国权   

  1. 河南农业大学 农林经济管理专业博士后科研流动站,郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-02 出版日期:2020-12-31 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:李国权(1978—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向:农村农业制度政策。E-mail:ndgqli@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC790075); 河南省软科学研究项目(182400410079)

Practical difficulties and solutions for the “three rights seperation” of the homestead in countryside

Li Guoquan   

  1. Postdoctoral Research Center of Agriculture and Forestry Economic Management Specialty, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2020-07-02 Online:2020-12-31 Published:2020-12-25

摘要: 宅基地“三权分置”改革制度取向、权利结构、利益关系、法律逻辑的深刻变革必将给利益均衡、乡村治理、国家调控与法律供给等带来多重实践难题。破解这些难题需要以重塑城乡土地权利关系为基础,超越农村土地静态管理的局限,通过开放性、系统性机制的设计,构建利益均衡配套机制、完善乡村基层治理体系、优化国家宏观调控方式和构筑“三权分置”法律体系,在有偿使用、有偿腾退、适度流转之间架起自由转换、相对平衡的制度通道。

关键词: 宅基地, 三权分置, 实践难题, 破解

Abstract: The profound reform of the system orientation, right structure, interest relationship and legal logic of the reform of homestead “three rights seperation” will bring multiple practical problems to the interests balance, rural governance, state regulation and legal supply. To solve these problems, we need to rebuild the relationship between urban and rural land rights, go beyond the limitations of the static management of rural land, build a supporting mechanism of interest balance, improve the rural grass-roots governance system, optimize the state’s macro-control methods and build a legal system of “three rights separation” through the design of an open and systematic mechanism. In this way, it is to build up a system of free transformation and relative balance between paid use, paid vacations and moderate circulation.

Key words: homestead in countryside, three rights seperation, practical difficulties, solution

中图分类号: